Pete Wargent blogspot

Co-founder & CEO of AllenWargent property buyer's agents, offices in Brisbane (Riverside) & Sydney (Martin Place), and CEO of WargentAdvisory (providing subscription analysis, reports & services to institutional clients).

5 x finance/investment author - 'Get a Financial Grip: a simple plan for financial freedom’ (2012) rated Top 10 finance books by Money Magazine & Dymocks.

"Unfortunately so much commentary is self-serving or sensationalist. Pete Wargent shines through with his clear, sober & dispassionate analysis of the housing market, which is so valuable. Pete drills into the facts & unlocks the details that others gloss over in their rush to get a headline. On housing Pete is a must read, must follow - he is one of the finest property analysts in Australia" - Stephen Koukoulas, MD of Market Economics, former Senior Economics Adviser to Prime Minister Gillard.

"Pete is one of Australia's brightest financial minds - a must-follow for articulate, accurate & in-depth analysis." - David Scutt, Business Insider, leading Australian market analyst.

"I've been investing for over 40 years & read nearly every investment book ever written yet I still learned new concepts in his books. Pete Wargent is one of Australia's finest young financial commentators." - Michael Yardney, Australia's leading property expert, Amazon #1 best-selling author.

"The most knowledgeable person on Aussie real estate markets - Pete's work is great, loads of good data and charts, the most comprehensive analyst I follow in Australia. If you follow Australia, follow Pete Wargent" - Jonathan Tepper, Variant Perception, Global Macroeconomic Research, and author of the New York Times bestsellers 'End Game' and 'Code Red'.

"The level of detail in Pete's work is superlative across all of Australia's housing markets" - Grant Williams, co-founder RealVision - where world class experts share their thoughts on economics & finance - & author of Things That Make You Go Hmmm...one of the world's most popular & widely-read financial publications.

"Wargent is a bald-faced realty foghorn" - David Llewellyn-Smith, MacroBusiness.

Tuesday, 11 March 2014

First homebuyers or first time investors?

Missing data

For a long time, some property market observers have been making the point that first homebuyers aren't being fully captured in the reported data.

Since first homebuyer grants and stamp duty exemptions are no longer fully available on existing properties in some states, such as New South Wales and Queensland, first-timers have had no reason to be recorded as such.

It's a point that has been made a great deal since the media reported the demise of first hombuyers in 2012, although it hasn't seen much mainstream media airtime.

However, although we can be certain that this is happening to some extent - with staff at brokerage and mortgage firms having admitted as much - it is not possible to measure the magnitude of the issue.

You can't measure what is not measured, and it remains something of an unknown.

FHB as investors

We have also made the point on many occasions that, particularly in cities like Sydney, more than ever before younger buyers are electing to start with a rental property first rather than a place of residence.

As a long-time believer in the flexibility offered by renting while investing heavily elsewhere, I can't say I'm all that surprised.

If anything, it can make a great deal of sense, since the monthly cashflows of renting are frequently cheaper than those of owning (mortgage rates tend to be higher than rental yields, while owners retain responsibility for a multitude of costs such as strata fees, insurance, repairs, maintenance etc).

People are also changing jobs and travelling more frequently and more widely than ever before, which can necessitate moving locations.

Trading properties can incur nasty transaction costs such as stamp duty, legal fees and agent fees, so why not buy and hold an investment instead?

All well and good, but what about the evidence to support this theory?

Digital Finance Analytics has looked into this further here and found via their surveys that that, as you can see below, as the number of first time owner-occupiers fell, the estimated number of first time investors was already beginning to rise.

FTBAll1

Source: Digital Finance Analytics

Of course, the mainstream media reporting has simply reported that first homebuyers have stopped buying, but the above chart suggests otherwise.

In fact, if you add the estimated number of first-time investors to first time owner occupiers, the chart implies that the total figure is tracking at a well above 8,000.

This is actually higher than has historically been the case, although one might hope and expect the numbers to increase over time as the population grows.

Why?

As for the reasons why first timers are looking at investment properties?

The surveys conducted by Digital Finance Analytics listed these as some of their main findings:

-the tax-efficient nature of property as an investment is considered very attractive

-the average age of first-time investors is 31 years

-more% than 60% of those surveyed were looking at a long-term buy and hold

-91.5% of investors believe that prices will rise over the next 12 months (presumably explaining why they wanted to get a foothold on the market via an investment property).

I've always felt that the reporting with regards to "first homebuyers" is largely rubbish, since it tends to revise on massive sweeping generalisations.

The term itself covers a huge cross-section of the population, from 18-year-olds leaving home to those more than double the age.

And, as we are seeing in Sydney time and time again, more and more people are electing to rent where they live and buy investment units elsewhere.

It's a trend I expect to see continuing. First home buyers haven't gone missing, they've just moved with the times.